Visit evano's column >>

EVANOHome Page

nothing more dangerous than a clever sheep
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 36; Links Seeded: 1039
Member Since: 12/2005Last Seen: 11/24/2009

Without Insurance, Man's Defibrillator Battery Ran Out -- Now His Sister Wants Everyone To Know

Read ArticleArticle Source: The Huffington Post
advertisement

My favorite part is the well-paid, well-insured cardiologist telling the pizza delivery guy to "get his priorities straight" and he'll come up with the money somehow, comparing the US$10,000 operation to replace the battery with keeping the oil changed in his car. The arrogance is astounding.

In 2003, William Koehler of Pittsburgh, Pa. lost his job as an electronics technician. He lost his health insurance, too, but he'd been lucky enough to have the defibrillator battery in his heart changed just the previous year. No insurer would cover him except for one company which refused to cover anything related to his arrhythmia, says his sister.

He survived as long as his battery did, dying on March 7, 2009 at 57.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
12
2.9
{"commentId":10283106,"authorDomain":"vault313"}

Everyone needs to know and understand the for profit insurance industry's role in denial of care and hijacking of meaningful reform. The GOP lie machine has convinced millions of Americans that a public option is "communism" or "socialism" or would mean the end of the U.S. as we know it. People need to educate themselves and understand what is at risk with this legislation, and the lost opportunity it would be to letting a public option go now. Go to http://www.insurancereformwatch.org/ for a full and comprehensive understanding of why insurance reform and a public option is crucial.

Don't believe the GOP hype and hysteria. We already have death panels-it's called "insurance".

{"commentId":10283106,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"vault313"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
{"commentId":10283456,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}

I guess their will be another story on:

http://www.namesofthedead.com/

I'd suggest you take a read there's some sickening stuff on their about how we let people die from lack of death-and-sickness-for-profit-financial-products (i guess insurance is the pc term)

{"commentId":10283456,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:19 AM EDT
{"commentId":10283506,"authorDomain":"vault313"}

Uggh, I'm not sure I can stomach any more of these stories. It's disgusting. It seems more and more the insurance industry should be prosecuted for genocide.

{"commentId":10283506,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"vault313"}
  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
{"commentId":10283542,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}
It seems more and more the insurance industry should be prosecuted for genocide.

Actually eugenics, if you think about it, baby too fat or too skinny? No insurance for you. Abused? no insurance for you. Afflicted with a non profitable disease? No insurance for you. Ever take aids medication after a rape, just to be on the safe side? No insurance for you.

Its the creation of the PROFITABLE RACE, they are after.

{"commentId":10283542,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
  • 7 votes
#2.2 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
{"commentId":10284706,"authorDomain":"asomatous"}

Holy crap, those stories are beyond heartbreaking! After paying taxes for so many years on every thing, you'd think that the U.S. would give back just a little.

{"commentId":10284706,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"asomatous"}
  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":10284457,"authorDomain":"asomatous"}

What the heck? That cardiologist is pretty stupid if he can't tell when financial adequacy outweighs need. Obviously the guy knew he needed to take care of his body, but like the article said, there's no comparison between the cost of oil vs. a new battery.

{"commentId":10284457,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"asomatous"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:15 PM EDT
{"commentId":10288300,"authorDomain":"nick46"}

The cardilogist may well do the pro bono surgery. Who will pay the other associated costs such as all the hospital related costs.

{"commentId":10288300,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"nick46"}
    #3.1 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:54 PM EDT
    {"commentId":10303979,"authorDomain":"asomatous"}

    We pay enough in taxes that some of the money should come back to us in our time of need.

    {"commentId":10303979,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"asomatous"}
      #3.2 - Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:31 AM EDT
      {"commentId":10319098,"authorDomain":"nick46"}

      Obama is trying to solve this issue. But apparently many people don't agree with you. They would rather have lower taxes than subsidize your life.

      {"commentId":10319098,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"nick46"}
        #3.3 - Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:23 PM EDT
        {"commentId":10321380,"authorDomain":"asomatous"}

        Than subsidize their own lives? That's rather ignorant.

        {"commentId":10321380,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"asomatous"}
          #3.4 - Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:59 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":10284791,"authorDomain":"nick46"}

          I'm not sure why anyone thinks that an insurance company would be willing to step up an pay a $10K bill? Amazing why don't you just go to the bank and ask them to pay. Or ask anyone for that matter.

          {"commentId":10284791,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"nick46"}
            Reply#4 - Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:33 PM EDT
            {"commentId":10691780,"authorDomain":"sheep"}

            Maybe the insurance company should pay because he likely paid them much more than $10K over the decades he'd been working for a company that carried insurance. I'm unemployed and even with the ARRA reduction of 2/3 of my COBRA payments for 9 months, I'll still have paid $8800 this year to my insurance company.

            Maybe they should pay because if the battery isn't user-replaceable, then the user can't be expected to bear the full repsonsibility of maintenance for it. Even @!$%#ing iPod owners have got the courts to assert their right to have their sealed battery replaced at a highly discounted rate.

            Or maybe they shouldn't pay voluntarily, but we should force them to pay by passing laws which require humane behavior from insurance companies just like we do from hospitals. An emergency room can't turn away a sick person whom they have never had any business with for inability to pay. Why should an insurance be allowed to turn away a dying former customer?

            Or maybe we should expose them to the law of the jungle which they are so quick to enforce. Perhaps we should take away all the subsidies the insurance companies get from all levels of government in the nature of tax breaks, strict licensing to keep out new players with new ideas, exemption from anti-trust statutes, etc.

            Or maybe we should convince these companies that unless they become good members of society, we will use the one penalty which we seem reluctant to use on corporations, but which we use easily on people: the death penalty. John Allen Muhammad was put to death last week for killing and/or wounding more than a dozen people in and around Washington DC in Fall 2002. But he was an amateur compared to the insurance industry who have the blood of 40,000 Americans on their hands every year. Perhaps the corporations should be subject to the death penalty for each person who dies because of lack of ability to get insurance.

            It sickens me that greed and selfishness have become accepted as a political and economic philosophy. It is revolting that "I shouldn't have to do anything which doesn't make me money" is seen as a reasonable statement of one's rights. And it is horrifying that this kind of reasoning comes from inanimate corporations. But it is downright evil to hear this evidence of a dead, uncaring soul coming from the mouth of a human being who is probably no more than a few missed paychecks away from facing the same situation himself.

            {"commentId":10691780,"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964","authorDomain":"sheep"}
              #4.1 - Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:24 PM EST
              Reply
              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"709701","isPrivate":false}
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              {"threadId":"709701","contentId":"3425964"}
              Start TrackingStart Tracking
              Stop TrackingStop Tracking