Visit evano's column >>

EVANOHome Page

nothing more dangerous than a clever sheep
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 36; Links Seeded: 1039
Member Since: 12/2005Last Seen: 11/24/2009

Gonzales pressures ISPs to retain network and subscriber data

advertisement

Obviously anyone opposing this request must be a supporter of child pornography, right? Under the guise of fighting kiddie-porn, privacy slowly withers away.

"U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller on Friday urged telecommunications officials to record their customers' Internet activities, CNET News.com has learned.

In a private meeting with industry representatives, Gonzales, Mueller and other senior members of the Justice Department said Internet service providers should retain subscriber information and network data for two years, according to two sources familiar with the discussion who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The closed-door meeting at the Justice Department, which Gonzales had requested, according to the sources, comes as the idea of legally mandated data retention has become popular on Capitol Hill and inside the Bush administration. Supporters of the idea say it will help prosecutions of child pornography because in many cases, logs are deleted during the routine course of business."

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
4.5
{"commentId":138366,"authorDomain":"bradfarris"}

  1. In order to fight the terrorists, we have to give up certain civil liberties. (Don't worry, we're not giving up the important ones, and if you're not a terrorist you have nothing to worry about)
  2. In order to fight the child pornographers, we have to give up a few more civil liberties. (Again, not really the important ones, if you're not a child pornographer you don't have anything to worry about)
  3. Hey, who ever said that civil liberties were all that important anyway? The Constitution? It's just a g*d d*mned piece of paper!

{"commentId":138366,"threadId":"16314","contentId":"232411","authorDomain":"bradfarris"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sun May 28, 2006 3:36 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"16314","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"16314","contentId":"232411"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking